Reality Cheque

The title of this blog is dedicated to those world views which mistake necessary for sufficient conditions, view reasoning as reducible to physics, and substitute reality with imagination. A subtitle of this blog could be “Reality Deficit,” since it endeavours to deal with world views, statements and definitions of existence which are inconsistent or deficient in reality. Invest or spend this reality cheque as you see fit, and please don’t hesitate to inform me if it ever bounces.

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Is Dr. Dembski's Work "Written in Jell-o?"

›
From here . CA: interviewer WD: Dr. Dembski CA: Your critics (such as Wein, Perakh, Shallit, Elsberry, Wolpert and others) seem unsatisfied...
5 comments:
Saturday, February 23, 2008

Published Method of Measuring Specificity (Function)

›
It looks like a PNAS article has finally caught up with and refined some of the work of Dr. Dembski. Here is the PNAS article that discuss...
Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Thoughts on God (Part 1)

›
As a Christian, Naturalistic Intelligent Design Advocate , and Panentheist (the most logical conclusion of course, IMO) I see God as perfect...
3 comments:

What Does a Specification Tell Us?

›
A specification technically only measures what chance and law on its own will not do. The reason that we *infer* intelligence, is for 4 reas...
Tuesday, February 12, 2008

New Moderation Policy

›
This is just a heads up to let anyone with a comment know that I have removed comment moderation from this blog. I kindly request that you f...
Monday, February 11, 2008

Design Detection before Method Detection

›
Blipey (a contributor to this debate on JoeG's blog ): "If they find something that they can't explain using the lexicon of kn...

Sum It All Up

›
To sum up, in light of my case for naturalistic Intelligent Design, there are three options from which we can chose an overall hypothesis (o...
3 comments:
›
Home
View web version

About Me

CJYman
I am a Christian and I believe that the universe and life was designed on purpose, with a purpose, and for a purpose. I believe that objective truth and reality do exist and can be discovered through reasoning. Regarding evolution, natural selection and evolution obviously occur, however the use of natural selection to produce increase of complex and specified information is not possible absent the existence of previous highly improbable and specified information not defined by physical properties of material used. I could be seen as a theistic evolutionist who also believes that the foundational tenets of Intelligent Design Theory are both scientific and correct. I describe myself as a realist and I also enjoy cooking and snowboarding.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.